ANATOMICAL AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY OF THE MANDIBLE OF BROWN BEARS (URSUS ARCTOS)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19630233

Keywords:

functional morphology, morphometry, mandibular canal, 3D reconstruction, feeding biomechanics, wildlife veterinary anatomy

Abstract

Understanding mandibular anatomy in brown bears (Ursus arctos) is essential for interpreting their feed-ing ecology and adaptive strategies. This study aims to provide a detailed morphological and morphometric analysis of the brown bear mandible using advanced imaging techniques, and to investigate how these ana-tomical features relate to the species’ omnivorous dietary habits. Twelve adult mandibles were obtained from brown bears that died of natural causes or were culled as part of wildlife population management programs. All specimens were scanned using high-resolution computed tomography. The computed tomography datasets were processed using specialized segmentation software to generate accurate three-dimensional reconstruc-tions of the mandibles. These digital models were then subjected to both morphometric measurements and qualitative anatomical assessment. The analysis revealed mandibular characteristics well-adapted to omniv-orous feeding, including a robust coronoid process, a broad pterygoid fossa, a strong mandibular condyle, and a well-defined mandibular canal, all of which contribute to efficient mastication of both animal and plant materials. Although the sample size was limited to 12 specimens, which may constrain the generalizability of the findings, the use of non-destructive, high-resolution imaging techniques allowed for precise anatomical characterization. The results provide important insights into the species’ functional morphology and have po-tential applications in both comparative anatomy and clinical veterinary practice. This study establishes a base-line for future comparative investigations into mandibular form and function in omnivorous mammals.

References

1. Ağaç, D. K., Onuk, B., Gündemir, O., Kabak, M., Manuta, N., Çakar, B., ... & Szara, T. (2024). Comparative cranial geometric morphometrics among Wistar albino, Sprague Dawley, and WAG/Rij rat strains. Animals, 14(9), 1274.

2. Akbaş, Z. S., Duro, S., Yalin, E. E., Gündemir, O., Özkan, E., & Szara, T. (2023). Detection of sexual dimorphism of the foramen magnum in cats using computed tomography. Anatomia, Histo-logia, Embryologia, 52(4), 595–602.

3. Aryal, A., Hopkins, J. B., Raubenheimer, D., Ji, W., & Brunton, D. (2012). Distribution and diet of brown bears in the upper Mustang Region, Nepal. Ursus, 23(2), 231–236.

4. Audisio, S. A., P. G. Vaquero, P. A. Torres, and E. C. Verna. (2011). Prevención, manejo y trata-miento del dolor quirúrgico. 1st ed. Santa Rosa: Universidad Nacional de La Pampa.

5. Beckman, B., and L. Legendre. (2002). Regional Nerve Blocks for Oral Surgery in Companion Animals. Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practising Veterinarian 24: 439–444.

6. Christiansen. P. (2007). Evolutionary implications of bite mechanics and feeding ecology in bears. Journal of Zoology. 272(4). 423-443.

7. Ciucci, P., Tosoni, E., Di Domenico, G., Quattrociocchi, F., & Boitani, L. (2014). Seasonal and annual variation in the food habits of Apennine brown bears, central Italy. Journal of Mammalogy, 95(3), 572–586.

8. Clarke, K. W., and C. M. Trim. (2013). Veterinary Anaesthesia e- Book. 1st ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Health Sciences.

9. Cotrim, S. C., J. R. B. Nardotto, L. G. Abreu, A. R. L. Silva, P. D. Galera, and M. I. S. Santana. (2015). Estudo anatômico do trajeto do canal mandibular em felinos (Felis catus domesticus). Ar-quivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 67: 1581–1588. https://doi.org/10. 1590/1678-4162-8325.

10. Courtenay, L. A., Maté-González, M. Á., Aramendi, J., Yravedra, J., González-Aguilera, D., & Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. (2018). Testing accuracy in 2D and 3D geometric morphometric methods for cut mark identification and classification. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 18, 529–542.

11. De Freitas. E. P., Noritomi. P. Y., & da Silva. J. V. L. (2011). Use of rapid prototyping and 3D reconstruction in veterinary medicine. In Advanced applications of rapid prototyping Technology in Modern Engineering. IntechOpen.

12. Demircioglu, I., Yilmaz, B., Gündemir, O., & Dayan, M. O. (2021). A three‐dimensional pelvimet-ric assessment on pelvic cavity of gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) by computed tomography. Anato-mia, Histologia, Embryologia, 50(1), 43–49.

13. Derocher, A. E., & Stirling, I. (1998). Geographic variation in growth of polar bears (Ursus mari-timus). Journal of Zoology, 245(1), 65–72.

14. Djorojevic, M., Roldán. C., García-Parra, P., Alemán. I. & Botella. M. (2014). Morphometric sex estimation from 3D computed tomography os coxae model and its validation in skeletal remains. International journal of legal medicine. 128. 879–888.

15. Evin, A., Souter, T., Hulme-Beaman, A., Ameen, C., Allen, R., Viacava, P. & Dobney, K. (2016). The use of close-range photogrammetry in zooarchaeology: Creating accurate 3D models of wolf crania to study dog domestication. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 9. 87–93.

16. Figueirido, B., & van Heteren, A. H. (2019). The story continues: recent advances on the life and death of the Pleistocene cave bear. Historical Biology, 31(4), 405–409.

17. Figueirido, B., Palmqvist, P., & Pérez‐Claros, J. A. (2009). Ecomorphological correlates of crani-odental variation in bears and paleobiological implications for extinct taxa: an approach based on geometric morphometrics. Journal of Zoology, 277(1), 70–80.

18. Gittleman. J. L. (1985). Carnivore body size: ecological and taxonomic correlates. Oecologia. 67. 540–554.

19. Glatt, S. E., K. E. Francl, and J. L. Scheels. (2008). A Survey of Current Dental Problems and Treatments of Zoo Animals. International Zoo Yearbook 42: 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1748-1090.2007.00032.x.

20. Gordon, K. R. & Morejohn. G. V. (1975). Sexing black bear skulls using lower canine and lower molar measurements. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 40–44.

21. Gündemir, O. (2023b). Shape analysis of fossa masseterica and processus coronoideus in domestic cats (Felis catus) and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 52(6), 899–906.

22. Gündemir, O., Michaud, M., Altundağ, Y., Karabağlı, M., Onar, V., & Crampton, D. (2024). Chew-ing asymmetry in dogs: Exploring the importance of the fossa masseterica and first molar teeth morphology. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 53(3), e13050.

23. Gündemir, O., Szara, T., Pazvant, G., Erdikmen, D. O., Duro, S., & Perez, W. (2021). Radiogramet-ric analysis of the thoracic limb phalanges in Arabian horses and thoroughbred horses. Animals, 11(8), 2205.

24. Gündemir, O., Szara, T., Yalin, E. E., Karabagli, M., Mutlu, Z., Yilmaz, O., ... & Parés-Casanova, P. M. (2023a). Examination of shape variation of the skull in British Shorthair, Scottish Fold, and Van Cats. Animals, 13(4), 614.

25. Hall, L. W., K. W. Clarke, and C. M. Trim. (2000). Wright's Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 10th ed. London: ELBS and Bailliere Tindall.

26. Herrero, S., Peyton. B. & Servheen. C. (1999). Bears: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Bear Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

27. Hwang, M. H., Garshelis, D. L., & Wang, Y. (2002). Diets of Asiatic black bears in Taiwan, with methodological and geographical comparisons. Ursus, 111–125.

28. Jashari, T., Duro, S., Gündemir, O., Szara, T., Ilieski, V., Mamuti, D., & Choudhary, O. P. (2022). Morphology, morphometry and some aspects of clinical anatomy in the skull and mandible of Sharri sheep. Biologia, 77(2), 423–433.

29. Kierdorf, H., O. Filevych, W. Lutz, and U. Kierdorf. (2016). Dental Defects as a Potential Indicator of Chronic Malnutrition in a Population of Fallow Deer (Dama dama) From Northwestern Ger-many. An Kurtén, B., 1955. Sex dimorphism and size trends in the cave bear. Acta Zoologica Fen-nica 90, 1–47.

30. Kurtén, B., 1968. Pleistocene Mammals of Europe.Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London. Atomical Record (Hoboken, N.J.: 2007) 299, no. 10: 1409–1423. https://doi.org/10. 1002/ar.23459.

31. Magalhães, H. I. R., F. B. Romão, Y. H. de Paula, et al. (2019). Morphometry of the Mandibular Foramen Applied to Local Anesthesia in Hoary Fox (Lycalopex vetulus). Pesquisa Veterinaria Bra-sileira 39: 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-5749.

32. Magalhães, H. I. R., R. L. Ferreira Júnior, Y. H. de Paula, et al. (2019). Morphometry of Mental Foramina Applied to Local Anesthesia in Hoary Fox (Lycalopex vetulus Lund, 1842). International Journal of Morphology 37: 1486–1492. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-9502201900 0401486.

33. Martinez, L. A. V., M. A. Gioso, C. M. V. Lobos, and A. C. B. de Campos Fonseca. (2010). Deter-minação do trajeto do canal mandibular por meio de tomografia computadorizada em dez man-díbulas de cadáveres de cães mesaticefálicos. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science 47, no. 4: 274–281. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678 4456.bjvras.2010.26826.

34. Mattson. D. J. (1998). Diet and morphology of extant and recently extinct northern bears. Ursus. 479–496.

35. Meloro. C. (2011). Feeding habits of Plio-Pleistocene large carnivores as revealed by the mandib-ular geometry. Journal of vertebrate Paleontology. 31(2). 428–446.

36. Núñez-Cook, S., Vidal, F., & Salinas, P. (2024). Anatomical and computed tomography study of the mandible of the Patagonian huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus): Ecological and clinical insights. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 53(6), e13108.

37. Ozkadif, S. & Eken. E. (2015). Contribution of virtual anatomic models to medical education. At-atürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi. 10(1).

38. Ozkan, E., Jashari, T., Gündemir, O., & Gezer İnce, N. (2020). Morphometric analysis of the mandible of Bardhoka autochthonous sheep in Kosovo. Anatomia, histologia, embryologia, 49(6), 737–741.

39. Paulo, C. B., H. I. R. Magalhães, Y. H. de Paula, et al. (2020). Morphometry of the Mandibular Foramen Applied to the Local Anesthetic Block to Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Boars (Sus scrofa scrofa Linnaeus, 1758). Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science 57: e161658.

40. Reid, D., Jiang, M., Teng, Q., Qin, Z., & Hu, J. (1991). Ecology of the Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in Sichuan, China.

41. Ruzhanova-Gospodinova, I. S., Vladova, S., Szara, T., Tandir, F., Szara, E., Yalin, E. E., & Gün-demir, O. (2024). Morpho-Geometric Description of the Skulls and Mandibles of Brown Bears (Ur-sus arctos) from the Dancing Bear Belitsa Park. Animals: an Open Access Journal from MDPI, 14(17), 2541.

42. Sacco, T. & Van Valkenburgh. B. (2004). Ecomorphological indicators of feeding behaviour in the bears (Carnivora: Ursidae). Journal of Zoology. 263(1). 41–54.

43. Senol, E., Gündemir, O., Duro, S., Szara, T., Demiraslan, Y., & Karadağ, H. (2022). A pilot study: Can calcaneus radiographic image be used to determine sex and breed in cats? Veterinary Medi-cine and Science, 8(5), 1855–1861.

44. Sergovich A., Johnson M., Wilson TD. (2010). Explorable three-dimensional digital model of the female pelvis. pelvic contents. and perineum for anatomical education. Anatomical Sciences Edu-cation. 3. 127–133

45. Slater, G. J., Figueirido, B., Louis, L., Yang, P., & Van Valkenburgh, B. (2010). Biomechanical consequences of rapid evolution in the polar bear lineage. PLoS One, 5(11), e13870.

46. Stirling, I. & Archibald, W. R. (1977). Aspects of predation of seals by polar bears. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada, 34(8), 1126-1129.

47. Van Heteren, A. H., MacLarnon, A., Soligo. C. & Rae. T. C. (2014). Functional morphology of the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) cranium: a three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis. Qua-ternary International. 339. 209–216.

48. Van Heteren, A. H., MacLarnon. A. Soligo. C. & Rae. T. C. (2016). Functional morphology of the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) mandible: a 3D geometric morphometric analysis. Organisms Diversity & Evolution. 16. 299–314.

49. Van Heteren, A., MacLarnon. A., Rae, T. & Soligo. C. (2009). Cave bears and their closest living relatives: a 3D geometric morphometrical approach to the functional morphology of the cave bear Ursus spelaeus. Acta Carsologica Slovaka. 47(S1). 33–46.

50. Wang, X., A. Liu, J. Zhao, F. M. Elshaer, and D. Massoud. (2021). Anatomy of the Skull of Saanen Goat. An Anesthesiology and Stereology Approach. International Journal of Morphology 39, No. 2: 423–429.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-18

How to Cite

Ruzhanova-Gospodinova, I., Mustafa, S., Vladova, S., Çakar, B., Ünal, B., & Can Güzel, B. (2026). ANATOMICAL AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY OF THE MANDIBLE OF BROWN BEARS (URSUS ARCTOS). TRADITION AND MODERNITY IN VETERINARY MEDICINE, 11(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19630233

Issue

Section

Articles